Bitphase AI, Ltd. Thursday, May 25 2006 

Michael Wilson, SIAI’s supergenius-class Associate Researcher, quietly launched a website last week for his private-sector AI project, Bitphase AI Ltd. As his logo indicates, an early application of the technology will be to improve the interoperability of software systems, particularly in the financial sector. This could save hundreds of millions of dollars in consulting fees. The technology will have other applications too, but I want to let Mr. Wilson release that information publicly at his own discretion. Mr. Wilson has been working on this technology for a couple years now, and is now getting ready to poke around for angel investments. His bio, from SIAI’s website:

Michael Wilson is a skilled software engineer with expertise in network protocols, physical simulation, language tools and distributed systems, and has significant experience in business and development team management. Michael has obtained a degree in computer science from Sheffield University and considerable experience at various IT companies. At Destiny Star Limited, he developed a real-time grid computing platform, raised the investment, and hired and ran a development team of 11 people. He is now in the early stages of prototyping a new AI technology.

From reading his Wiki notes and through multiple conversations, it is clear to me that Mr. Wilson is not only extremely intelligent but is familiar with the pitfalls of AI research in a way that very few others are. He is one of only a few dozen researchers working actively towards AI with a general problem-solving capacity that is adaptive to changing circumstances. If you want to get in on the ground floor of what could very well be a revolutionary new technology, get in touch with him.

A Puzzle Thursday, May 25 2006 

Meet two intelligent AIs. One of these has a goal system based on Coherent Extrapolated Volition, the other has the supergoal of obtaining the launch codes to the world’s nuclear arsenals and eliminating every major human city. In other words, one is Friendly, one is unFriendly. Which is which?

Protip: their behavior is roughly identical until they know they can accomplish their goals independently.

More on Notebook Friday, May 12 2006 

Images of Google Notebook, which is out next week. See also the Sonic Weapon of Vladimir Gavreau if you’re in the mood for something else.

Four New Google Products Wednesday, May 10 2006 

had their Press Day today, which included the announcement of 4 new products:

Google Trends
Google Desktop 4
Google Co-op
Google Notebook

My comments:

Google Trends (not yet online) will let you look at the frequency a given word or phrase is entered into Google as a search query. This idea is nothing new. Online marketers will all recognize the Overture and Wordtracker keyword suggestion tools. Google itself maintains Google Zeitgeist which lists some most-searched keywords for previous months. But Google Trends will allow people to search for whichever keywords they want. It will give the world a better metric for topic popularity than anything else yet available – Technorati and Alexa rankings being the old primary sources for that information.

The new Google Desktop features something called Gadgets, which includes a sidebar that fits on your desktop. I just installed it and found most of the gadgets entirely useless. It has an analog clock – I don’t need an analog clock because there is the digital clock in the bottom-left corner of the screen. It comes with a power bar indicator – this isn’t too useful because my laptop is rarely unplugged. It comes with a widget that shows a feed of Google news – I don’t need this because I can look at the news through Bloglines and rather wouldn’t be distracted by news in a sidebar. There is a new email display box – this isn’t too useful for me because I don’t use gmail and so spam that normally would get filtered into a spam folder is instead displayed in sidebar. And so on. Also, I found that when the sidebar was installed and made itself at home on the right side of my screen, it pushed aside all the icons that were there previously, shoving them unceremoniously to the left of the screen! Is this a metaphor for how Google is infringing upon the Microsoft space now? ;)

Part of the announcement was that an API will be released so that anyone can produce their own gadgets. This could end up being useful. I also haven’t yet checked out all the available gadgets – perhaps some are actually worth installing. But my initial impression of this sidebar is lukewarm. Maybe this new Google Desktop will be appealing to people that don’t know about RSS feeds and have to be introduced to them through this sort of a medium. The Google Calendar and Google Video plugins certainly look enticing.

Google Co-op I don’t quite understand yet. It’s supposed to have something to do with improving your search results with the authoritative input of people and organizations. We have yet to see how this plays out, but again I am slightly skeptical. Do we want to bias our search results in favor of the opinions of people and organizations? I guess that will be our choice.

Google Notebook is a really cool idea. Basically it’s a browser plugin that hovers in the bottom-left hand corner of the browser and you can drag text and images into it. This creates a personalized “notebook”, which can then be shared publicly at your desire. Out of all the introduced products, this is probably the simplest and in my eyes the most potentially useful. It will be out next week in Google Labs.

1. Accelerating 2. Future Wednesday, May 10 2006 

Today, I am going to refer you to some lists. From Guy Kawasaki, there is the Top Ten Lies of Venture Capitalists, the Top Ten Lies of Entrepreneurs, and the Top Ten Lies of Engineers. By John Van Sickle there is the Grand List of Overused Science Fiction Clichés. And by Edward Smith we have the extremely lengthy Catalog Of Correctable Omnipresent Human Flaws.

RoboTurtle II Monday, May 8 2006 

Check out this animated movie by Zeb and Ben Goertzel. It takes a little while to download and watch, but I was highly amused. Zeb is the 12 year-old son of Ben, who is working on the Novamente AGI engine. Fittingly, the plot of the movie revolves around an AI that uses a robotic turtle as its body. This shows that even a gifted child can understand the risk posed by AI – why is it that even some adults seem to have difficulty? Anyway the movie is extremely funny.

Popular Mechanics, the magazine that originally introduced me to molecular nanotechnology, seems to have decided that being blatantly transhumanist in a mainstream magazine is now O.K. Usually they come at the field from a toned-down perspective, but apparently not anymore. Even Robert Freitas, father of medical nanotechnology, is mentioned in the second paragraph.

Share your OPML. This is a new project from one of the fathers of RSS. See how “mainstream” your feeds are, browse other people’s feeds, etc. I like the clean design.

I reached my 1,000th post on ImmInst!

The above image is a screenshot of the electric sheep screensaver, which is the most mesmerizing screensaver ever.

Extropy Institute Closes Friday, May 5 2006 

After 17 years of existence, the once-flagship transhumanist non-profit, Extropy Institute, has closed. Unanimous vote by the Board of Directors. This is partially symbolic as the Extropy Institute as a coordinated whole has not engaged in any projects since 2001 except for the online VP Summit, a follow-up, and a site redesign. But a lot of really smart and creative people identify with it, calling themselves “extropians”, a metaphorical title meaning “against entropy”. The general consensus among extropians is that this closure marks the end of an era.

The Extropy Institute seemed to hit its peak of activity and fame in the mid-90s, when it was holding lively gatherings in Silicon Valley, getting profiled in the likes of Wired magazine, and just generally bathing in the optimism and futurism of the dot com boom. They held a conference as recently as 2001, but since then the primary footprint of the Extropy Institute has been its active mailing list, which of course will continue despite the shutdown. It is still the most active transhumanist mailing list around.

Anyone who has been involved with the Extropians will recall the acronym BEST DO IT SO, standing for the extropian principles of Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology and Spontaneous Order. Here is a poem. In recent times the principles have been modified to be more politically neutral and so on.

This is something that has kinda plagued the Extropy Institute in the past few years – it started off as a right-leaning, primarily libertarian organization, then attempted to become more politically neutral and all-encompassing in the new century. It never really shook the libertarian connection, though. The World Transhumanist Organization (WTA), now the unchallenged org for general-purpose transhumanism, was created as politically neutral from the get-go, making it more suitable as an umbrella group. Even though the WTA’s executive director Dr. J is a huge advocate of democratic socialism, he does a good job of using his Cyborg Democracy blog/movement as an outlet rather than compromising the political neutrality of the organization he runs. On the WTA mailing lists, socialists and libertarians argue a bit, but the intelligent ones are able to play nice.

Natasha’s announcement on Extropy Institute’s close says that the Board of Directors believe that the Extropy Institute has accomplished its mission. Like the straight-talking Samantha Atkins on the extropy list, I have to disagree. Please – don’t pretend that the Institute is shutting down because the mission is accomplished. We will know when the transhumanist project is achieved, and it could take years, decades, or even centuries. Indicators for a transhumanist “Mission Accomplished” include manifest absence of non-voluntary death, disease, aging, ignorance, hunger, violence, etc. On the list, Natasha responds to Samantha’s sentiment by saying the mission has been “essentially completed” rather than “totally completed”, but again, this just isn’t true… sorry. It undermines the grandiosity of transhumanism to say that transhumanist goals are “essentially completed” as of 2006.

If anything has been accomplished, the Extropy Institute has played a big role in expanding the discussion of transhumanist ideas of radical space travel, life extension, cryonics, molecular manufacturing, artificial intelligence, and so on. These ideas were considered crazy about two decades ago, unpolite in conversation a decade ago, but are becoming almost acceptable nowadays. Hal Finney observes: “…the world has changed enormously since the 1980s when Max and Tom invented the idea of Extropy, and even since the early 1990s when this mailing list was born in its earlier incarnation. Ideas which at that time were considered too outlandish even for science fiction are now debated regularly in the corridors of power and on the front pages of major newspapers and other opinion leaders.” Indeed.

Regarding the ExI shutdown, long-time extropian Spike Jones remarks, “Many of us have one period of formative years in our lives, when we form the memetic framework, the philosophical basis of our entire lives. Usually these are in our youth.” He then goes on to say that he was fortunate to have two formative periods, the latter being his exposure to extropy in middle age.

Myself, I discovered transhumanism online via Extropy.org in 2001. I called myself an extropian then and still do today, just that the more general “transhumanist” is a label that seems to make more sense. Extropians were transhumanists before the word “transhumanist” was really known.

Not entirely ceasing collective activity, the Strategic Plan 2006 and the Proactionary Principle are cited as the foundation of future moves. Extropy Institute founder Max More is coming out with a book of that name (Proactionary Principle), hopefully soon. And of course the mailing list remains a source of some of the most intelligent chatter on myriad topics to be found on the Internet.

Future Imperative suggests that the members decided they had more to gain by pursuing their own projects independently rather than under the aegis of a political lightning rod.

Justin Corwin shares how finding the Extropy Institute was a turning point in his life, and that there are more extropian thinkers today than ever before.

If you run across other eulogies, post them in the ol’ comments section. Of course there will be a lag for comment approval, as each day there are about 10 spam comments. (Will install a filter for this.) Goodbye ExI, and I wish everyone luck on their independent projects. I’m sure that Max and Natasha will continue to be leaders in the transhumanist community.

What Are Your Intentions? Thursday, May 4 2006 

http://www.intention-cloud.net/

I love the site design. And the concept is great too. Look at clouds on your favorite subjects. See also Sphere.

By the way, are you reading this blog using an RSS feeder? You really should be. I use Bloglines, which takes less than a minute to register for. The list of blogs I read daily can be found here. There is a serious lack of Singularity blogs, I have to say.

The Transhumanist Collective Tuesday, May 2 2006 

http://www.transhumanism.org/resources/faq.html

If you read this blog regularly, you’ve almost certainly heard of transhumanism. Of course this is the idea that Homo sapiens is merely a stepping stone in the evolutionary process and if we can use technology to make ourselves smarter, happier, wiser, kinder, longer-lived, and disease-free, then by all means we should. In this sense, “technology” is not this foreign agency impinging upon us, but merely the continuation of evolution via other means. As technology gets better, it becomes less like a set of static tools and more like an organic, adaptive extension of our minds and bodies. That is to say, more like elegant sorcery and less like the rusty abominations of yesteryear.

There are millions of people around the globe who think of technology in this way, and embrace a future where humanity is more intimately connected with our technological appendages. However, there are many important ideas, movements, and people that these millions are unexposed to because they are not familiar with “transhumanism” as such. This is something that transhumanists like myself are trying to change, by reaching out a hand and saying “join the discussion, and familiarize yourself with the philosophical cutting edge”.

Transhumanism is what happens when people grow up and realize that human beings are not evolution’s final say, but merely a prologue in a much greater and longer chapter of existence. When people realize that God is a fairy tale, and that the next breakthrough coming from the labs holds greater significance than the next candidate voted into office. Politicians and laypeople everywhere are beginning to get the picture – it matters less what you say than what technology you have at your disposal. This is why presidential speeches are peppered with mentions of the importance of alternative energy and the dangers of nuclear proliferation. Good technology improves the lives of millions and bad technology has the potential to murder millions. Social ideas are merely a footnote. This viewpoint is extremely controversial but could not be better-supported.

We’re programmed by our genes to overfocus on social ideas. In the environment where our ancestors spent 99.99% of their evolutionary history, paying attention to social ideas could mean the difference between life and death, passing on your genes or taking them to your grave. But technology pretty much stayed the same through thousands of generations. Not today. Social ideas change fast, but technology changes faster.

This transhumanist movement – or rather, family of movements – tries to anticipate what will happen when technology wraps back around its creators and allows us to effortlessly customize every aspect of our selves and surroundings. When technology allows us to experience new sensations and worlds directly, without the clumsy medium of an electronic device. Transhumanism is certainly not speculative. It is not necessarily futuristic. It is an ongoing process that can be seen in headlines daily, and has a history that stretches back to the story of Icarus and before.

Although people have been dreaming about it in the abstract for milennia, the philosophy of transhumanism was formally kickstarted in the early 80s by a small group of right-leaning, well-educated futurists who either attended or hung around the University of California, Los Angeles. You might be visualizing some socially inept, pizza-faced WASPs playing Atari in their parents’ basement, but the original transhumanists were anything but. Fereidoun Esfandiary, the son of an Iranian diplomat who had lived in 17 countries by the time he turned eleven, a futurist and author in his early 50s, was central to the foundation of the movement. Then there was Nastasha Vita-More, a bodybuilder, model, and revolutionary artist who produced the cable TV show “TransCentury UPdate” which garnered over 100,000 viewers. Max More, at the time a philosophy student, went on to acquire a Ph.D and be invited to debate cryonics on CNN’s Crossfire program, among other media appearances.

Continue researching prominent transhumanists and you will not easily find adherents whose boyfriend or girlfriend’s name ends in .jpeg or whose greatest accomplishment was selling their level 60 Everquest character for $700. We’re talking about the father of the multibillion-dollar field of nanotechnology. The co-founder of Paypal, which was acquired by eBay for $1.5 billion. A columnist for the New York Times. A pioneer in the field of space tourism. The record-holder for academic achievement in Sweden. Perfect SAT scorers, five-sigma geniuses, graduates from the best universities on the planet.

To the casual observer, these tens of thousands of thinkers may look unrelated to one another. They’re spread across a hundred different fields and interests – computer security, philosophy, electronic music, journalism, neuroscience, aging research, aerospace, sculpture, robotics, law, and so many more. But behind the scenes, they are communicating and bringing their futurist vision to fruition through the hearts and minds of millions of technophiles and armchair philosophers, many of which are transhumanists but just don’t know it yet.

Collectively, the above logos represent nine non-profits, six media outlets, six blogs, two print magazines, two cryonics companies, one AI company, a philosophical journal, an artistic movement, and a music lab. And this is just scratching the surface – there are thousands of transhumanists who are part of the community but not specifically affiliated with any particular organization. These individuals drift from org to org like gluons in an atomic nucleus, minimizing clique-ishness and maximizing the free flow of ideas and skepticism. Despite the far-out nature of some of the subject matter, the formation of a cult dynamic is neigh impossible because the communication is primarily virtual and there are about as many transhumanist creeds as there are transhumanists. There has long been talk of a transhumanist political party, but most transhumanists seem to think that inventing stuff is a better approach than playing politics.

The movement has experienced its most rapid growth in the last six years. Thousands of people giving millions of dollars in donations to support dozens of causes and intiatives through a handful of non-profits. These intiatives range from working towards a cure for aging to developing molecular machinery to theoretical work for self-improving Artificial Intelligence. It is a wonderful tapestry of highly enthusiastic intellectuals who love to look towards the future but have their feet firmly planted in the present.

Transhumanism’s exponential progress in recent years is so astounding to me that I would like to write a short book about it, and self-publish if necessary. If you want to help with consulting, research, or sponsorship, don’t hesitate to give a shout.

For more pictures of transhumanists in their natural habitat, check out the album from ImmInst’s 2005 conference.