Michael Vassar’s Papers Wednesday, Aug 9 2006
singularity and transhumanism 7:30 pm

One of the most brilliant people I have ever met is Michael Vassar.
We are both focused on minimizing the probability of a planetary disaster that wipes out all life, be it biological, nanotechnological, or infosci in origin. Today, myself and Vassar share membership in two organizations: the Center for Responsible Nanotechnology (CRN) and the Lifeboat Foundation. At CRN, we are both members of the CRN Global Task Force, and at the Lifeboat Foundation, he is Director of Long-term Strategy while I am Fundraising Director for North America. We are also big advocates of the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence.
Following are links to some papers of his, which you should consider checking out:
Corporate Cornucopia
The development of Molecular Nanotechnology (MNT) promises to rapidly lead to cheap superior replacements for a large majority of durable goods, all existing utilities, a substantial fraction of all non-durable goods and some services. For this reason and due to the relatively low expected cost of developing nanofactories, MNT represents the largest commercial opportunity of all time. Unfortunately, the very size of the opportunity, combined with its extreme suddenness, military significance, potential for disruption of existing institutions, and ease of duplication create certain severe complications which lead to difficulties in capturing the value created.
Although Transhumanism is not a religion, advocating as it does the critical analysis of any position; it does have certain characteristics which may lead to its identification as such by concerned skeptics. I am sure that everyone here has had to deal with this difficulty, and as it is a cause of perplexity for me I would appreciate it if anyone who has some suggested guidelines for interacting honestly with non-transhumanists share them at the end of my presentation. It seems likely to me that each of our minds contains either meme complexes or complex functional adaptations which have evolved to identify “religious” thoughts and to neutralize their impact on our behavior.
Sky High: What Distinguished the Highest Performing Team of All?
Radar, digital computation, and of course nuclear fission; World War 2 brought in the age of big science with a flurry of revolutionary technologies, each developed in only a few years with the help of government funding. Since then, the super well funded research project has continued to be an important model for scientific development, despite both the warnings of such illustrious figures as Freeman Dyson and Norbert Werner and the visible fact that it has lacked any noteworthy successes for a period exceeding thirty years.
Flexible Automated Manufacturing
The integration of distributed information systems with modern manufacturing techniques promises to enable a massive change in both production and distribution. Techniques are described. Economic and regulatory implications are addressed.
The molecular Manufacturing Revolution, like the Industrial Revolution and the Agricultural Revolution, should allow humans to live with a much smaller ecological footprint than their less technologically enabled ancestors could, but like previous revolutions it will also greatly increase the possible ecological footprint of a single individual. Transportation is one of the better examples of this.
Nanoscale technology energy products
Nanoscale technology promises several advanced and even breakthrough technologies that may reduce our dependence on fossil fuels. For many of these technologies, practicality requires advanced software controls and a very low cost per feature, but not molecular manufacturing.
There’s also a talk of his at a Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies event in NYC in May 2007, it’s called “Lead Me Not Into Temptation: Folk-Psychological Conceptions of Willpower and Their Implications for Policy”.

August 10th, 2006 at 3:22 am
You should also include Michael’s Nanoshield article from Lifeboat:
http://lifeboat.com/ex/nanoshield
August 10th, 2006 at 4:42 pm
Whilst genetic modification may seem unusual and perhaps even unnatural today in the long run I think many biological life forms (including humans) will be subject to some degree of genetic modification. GM is really just a more direct form of the systematic selective breeding of animals and plants which has been going on at least for the last 10,000 years since the agricultural revolution. I think humans will not be able to resist the desire to tinker with their own design, and that within a few decades there will be a thriving industry in cosmetic genetic modification (change the colour of your hair/eyes with an injected retrovirus carrying the relevant genes, etc)
January 12th, 2007 at 7:43 am
[…] This is great news. Prominent economists are writing papers and articles that reveal them to be blatantly transhumanistic. Even though I’ve been reading literature on the intersection of cognitive psychology and economics for a while, it was my colleague Michael Vassar who really kicked off my interest in economics in early 2004. […]
April 21st, 2007 at 10:02 pm
[…] Michael Vassar writes in response to my post on rationality as an optimzation for equilibriums that emerge from thoughtless wandering: So, how should we compare the equilibriums in question if not rationally? […]
May 18th, 2007 at 4:23 pm
[…] browsing the SL4 mailing list archives, as I am wont to do, I ran across this post by Michael Vassar that I thought made a lot of good points in a small space. It was in response to a couple people […]
August 20th, 2007 at 11:24 am
[…] consider the talk brilliant, and have praised Michael here before, but it’s really worth listening to this talk closely and understanding […]
February 16th, 2009 at 11:04 am
[…] Force. Those who would like to see more can view Michael Anissimov’s archive of some of my writings at his website, and some of my most recent talks, an Institute of Ethics and Emerging Technologies […]