Accelerating Future

Dubai Architecture Sunday, Jun 3 2007 

images Michael Anissimov 6:21 am

 

Trackback URI

19 Responses to “Dubai Architecture”

  1. Jonathan says:
    June 3, 2007 at 10:12 pm

    i cant see dubai’s castle crashing anytime soon. only 3% of their economy is based off of oil and although they have been accused of not addressing workers rights issues, the only difference between them and the states is that we pay other countries to host our slave workers for us.

    Having said that, yes, why can’t we just admire a nice picture…

    Reply
  2. Soundacious says:
    June 4, 2007 at 8:51 am

    Okay, I’ll do it.

    WIKKIDAWSUM! The future is twisty!

    Reply
  3. Jonathan Despres says:
    June 5, 2007 at 11:54 pm

    the image that we see here is the future of architecture. Plain skycrapers will be changed to swirly much more. I mean we will see much more of those buildings…

    Reply
  4. MCP2012 says:
    June 6, 2007 at 5:02 pm

    Perhaps. Probably much more underground stuff as well, to the extent that emerging tech will make this alternative much more cost-effective. There’ll still be trade-offs to be dealt with, though, which still implies economic (monetary?) calculation of a sort (see Hayek & Mises’ stuff).

    And, yes, it is a nice pic. I think not-so-distant-future architecture will actually be even *more* fascinating and esthetically innovative. (Sure AI’s will help out in creative ways in the architectural bailywick as well, no?)

    You’re doing SUCH a good job, Michael, with this blog. Keep up the good work! ;)

    Ciao for now…

    Reply
  5. FrF says:
    June 8, 2007 at 12:16 pm

    I want to second what MCP wrote. I already learned a lot from reading this blog. Thanks, Michael!

    (Sometimes I think Michael tilts the balance between politics and technology too much in favour of the latter. But of course I agree completely with him that we — I mean people whose outlook on life comes from the Humanities — need to hunker down and get acquainted with the different technological and scientific paradigm shifts that may come within the next decades.)

    Reply
  6. Shankar says:
    January 18, 2008 at 6:29 am

    WoW!!WoW!!WoW!!!I jus cant wait for that buildin to get itself constructed!!!I wish to be the first one in the buildin!!!=)

    Reply
  7. melanonia says:
    February 5, 2008 at 2:30 pm

    Who’s going to clean the windows?

    ^^^says the architecture student :oD

    Reply
  8. Mark says:
    February 14, 2008 at 7:41 pm

    Is this really possible. I mean the building curves all the way up. I like the design though. If it does some how get built I’ll be the first one in it.

    Reply
  9. G. says:
    March 5, 2008 at 10:06 pm

    Look you all! what matters is what you as one think. Some prefers future architecture and some others vernacular. What you need as architects is express your ideas in your place. DO IT!

    Reply
  10. matty poo says:
    March 11, 2008 at 1:38 am

    look i think its cool but how will the elavator make it up to the top without bumbing into a wall

    Reply
  11. Blaine says:
    March 13, 2008 at 3:07 pm

    This is quite a possible structure. Looking at the pictures there seems to be an area that a central corridor would make a straight path to the top, minus the tip. The spiral then would kinda self balance around the central corridor. Interesting theory used in a different way. Perhaps it is a cantilever concept (structurally)

    Reply
  12. Brian says:
    March 15, 2008 at 5:14 am

    Wow, you guys … don’t worry about the elevator. It will be fine. First of all, each of these buildings definitely encloses a straight, vertical line all the way up. Look at it. Second, who says an elevator has to go straight up and down? I’m sure it could run on a track, on whatever curve is desired. I don’t think funding is necessarily an issue here, either! Hah.

    All that aside, the design is not at all to my taste. In moving away from “traditional” styles of architecture, shouldn’t we be moving toward more functional rather than less functional? I don’t see the point of twisting like this. Unless it’s somehow more resistant to earthquakes…

    Reply
  13. Mohan says:
    March 28, 2008 at 1:34 pm

    This doesnt seems to be a odd one to build this little creature. We have proved in building a pyramid and the wall of C, without using any modern tools. Now “We have tools-Let use it”

    Technology Future…

    Reply
  14. steg says:
    June 16, 2008 at 6:22 am

    wot is the point in the things twisting ?

    they would look fine just straight me say’s =D

    Reply
  15. blackcatxxx says:
    July 27, 2008 at 11:39 pm

    the buildings r simply Spell bounding n breath taking…however, i wonder if it is something that can actually b built.

    Reply
  16. Elly says:
    September 3, 2008 at 2:52 pm

    how come there is no research for this building?that stinks! I need to find it its part of my grade! and also in looked for the research thing with my friend and i can’t find it that’s not cool!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  17. Princezz says:
    September 23, 2008 at 4:20 am

    I think its completely possible for this building to be built. Every curve counteracts the other to balance the structure. And as far as the question as to why its twisty, the answer is simple: we have over used straight soo much that its becoming absolutely absurd. Besides, some of us want to see interesting shapes in our surroundings rather than sticks after sticks.

    Having said that the design of the building does not in any way make it impractical. It just that instead of making a cylinder, circle floors on top of each other, they have just moved each floor a little and come up with something a lot more interesting than a cylinder. I hope anyone can appreciate that.

    Reply
  18. Cshuai says:
    January 24, 2009 at 4:02 am

    It`s so cool
    like some outside star biology
    :)

    Reply
  19. ashtree says:
    May 16, 2009 at 7:35 pm

    cant believe the level of ppl commenting about this building,,, more like a picture.
    what is this project based on? the theory of what?? sorry i cannot connect with anything yet.
    This is certainly not just an aesthetic sort, nor cant read cultural aspect. Maybe dubai does respect these kind of super-futurisitc designs, as they always produce those experimental architecture images.
    i really really hate this. just to me feels anti-environmental. it will kill the earth. dont build these please.
    Oh and im sure it is free to show my opinion ab this isnt it Michael?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Categories:

  • aerospace (3)
  • AI (200)
  • animal rights (14)
  • anthropics (7)
  • art/music (2)
  • articles (2)
  • BCI (13)
  • bioethics (10)
  • biology (30)
  • brain (14)
  • chemistry (3)
  • comics (5)
  • cryonics (35)
  • cybernetics (5)
  • environmentalism (4)
  • ethics (8)
  • events (99)
  • friendly ai (115)
  • futurism (148)
  • humor (18)
  • images (61)
  • intelligence (39)
  • interviews (17)
  • IQ (7)
  • kurzweil (1)
  • life extension (79)
  • lifeboat (10)
  • manufacturing (5)
  • math (2)
  • me (12)
  • meta (62)
  • nanotechnology (131)
  • nuclear (20)
  • philanthropy (13)
  • philosophy (69)
  • physics (12)
  • policy (5)
  • politics (12)
  • random (78)
  • rationality (13)
  • religion (8)
  • risks (145)
  • robotics (50)
  • science (32)
  • SIAI (86)
  • singularity (305)
  • space (42)
  • superintelligence (45)
  • technology (124)
  • transhumanism (249)
  • treaties (2)
  • uploading (8)
  • videos (137)
  • warfare (4)
  • web 2.0 (12)

Monthly:

  • January 2012 (2)
  • December 2011 (8)
  • November 2011 (8)
  • October 2011 (5)
  • September 2011 (12)
  • August 2011 (12)
  • July 2011 (21)
  • June 2011 (18)
  • May 2011 (5)
  • April 2011 (11)
  • March 2011 (17)
  • February 2011 (21)
  • January 2011 (44)
  • December 2010 (44)
  • November 2010 (32)
  • October 2010 (21)
  • September 2010 (40)
  • August 2010 (40)
  • July 2010 (32)
  • June 2010 (39)
  • May 2010 (44)
  • April 2010 (25)
  • March 2010 (14)
  • February 2010 (40)
  • January 2010 (39)
  • December 2009 (47)
  • November 2009 (84)
  • October 2009 (71)
  • September 2009 (65)
  • August 2009 (52)
  • July 2009 (33)
  • June 2009 (70)
  • May 2009 (48)
  • April 2009 (40)
  • March 2009 (52)
  • February 2009 (20)
  • January 2009 (20)
  • December 2008 (1)
  • November 2008 (2)
  • October 2008 (4)
  • September 2008 (15)
  • August 2008 (14)
  • July 2008 (1)
  • June 2008 (16)
  • May 2008 (58)
  • April 2008 (31)
  • March 2008 (45)
  • February 2008 (27)
  • January 2008 (3)
  • December 2007 (5)
  • November 2007 (7)
  • October 2007 (29)
  • September 2007 (18)
  • August 2007 (11)
  • July 2007 (24)
  • June 2007 (20)
  • May 2007 (23)
  • April 2007 (27)
  • March 2007 (29)
  • February 2007 (11)
  • January 2007 (26)
  • December 2006 (22)
  • November 2006 (44)
  • October 2006 (27)
  • September 2006 (28)
  • August 2006 (39)
  • July 2006 (9)
  • June 2006 (6)
  • May 2006 (9)
  • April 2006 (6)
  • March 2006 (9)
  • February 2006 (3)
  • January 2006 (16)

RSS Feeds:

  • Posts | Comments

Technorati:

  • Blogs that link here.

Author:



    Follow mikeanissimov on Twitter

    Support:

    • Prior Donors.

| © 2011 Accelerating Future |