Paris Hilton Signing Up for Cryonics Friday, Oct 19 2007
cryonics 5:05 am

No joke! This is big news. Paris Hilton is going to be cryopreserved. I never thought I’d be posting about Hilton on Accelerating Future, but there you go. This news is via Eliezer Yudkowsky on Overcoming Bias, who broke it as follows:
“Anyone not signed up for cryonics has now lost the right to make fun of Paris Hilton, because no matter what else she does wrong, and what else you do right, all of it together can’t outweigh the life consequences of that one little decision.
Congratulations, Paris. I look forward to meeting you someday.”
I totally agree. You can make fun of Ms. Hilton all you want, but if in 100 years you’re rotting in the ground, and she has her frozen cells repaired and remetabolized by nanomedicine, guess who’s laughing now?
Here is the article from FemaleFirst:
“Paris Hilton wants to be frozen with her beloved pets when she dies.
The hotel heiress is keen to live forever and has invested a large sum of money in the world’s biggest suspended animation cemetery, Cryonics Institute.
She wants her body to be preserved and then brought back to life, along with her favourite pets, including her famous Chihuahua Tinkerbell and new mutt, Yorkshire Terrier Cinderella.
‘The Simple Life’ star said: “It’s so cool. Almost all the cells in the body are still alive when death is pronounced.
“And if you’re immediately cooled, you can be perfectly preserved.
“My life could be extended by hundreds and thousands of years.”
Earlier this week, Paris revealed her partying lifestyle left her feeling “empty inside”.
The 26-year-old blonde - who spent 23 days in jail for driving offences in June - is now determined to turn her life around and do worthy things instead of being seen falling out of nightclubs.
Paris - who is planning a visit to Rwanda - said: “Before, my life was about having fun, going to parties - it was a fantasy. But when I had time to reflect, I felt empty inside. I want to leave a mark on the world.”
Whether she’s serious or not, I don’t know, but signing up for cryonics isn’t the sort of PR stunt to do for popular support — so it was obviously her personal decision. I myself associate signing up with cryonics with long-term thinking about the future of humanity, but maybe some see it as selfishness. Your mileage may vary.
In the comments, Carl Shulman pointed out that she might have gotten the idea from a magician she worked with on The Simple Life. They have signed up for different companies, however — Hilton with Cryonics Institute, and the magician with American Cryonics.
Immortalism marches forward, now with Paris Hilton’s support. Who’s signing up next?

October 19th, 2007 at 6:08 am
Thank you!
I finally have a solid, unarguable reason to NOT cryopreserve myself.
October 19th, 2007 at 6:26 am
I think I read something yesterday about Paris being cryopreserved, but it wasn’t an announcement and the person didn’t seem to be serious.
October 19th, 2007 at 6:29 am
When someone I don’t like does something, I will automatically not do it. Paris Hilton breathes oxygen, therefore I will hold my breath until I turn blue in the face.
Smart.
PS. Enjoy your coffin.
October 19th, 2007 at 7:04 am
The first comment on the news article is depressing. “I feel sorry for society in the future!”
Since Ms. Hilton has proven herself open to cryonics, she may be more open than most celebrities to sponsoring and advocating low-visibility, high-impact charities. Her money could do a lot of good and her fame could generate a lot more money for SIAI/Lifeboat/CRN/…. OTOH, as long as she’s considered stupid, her support could be bad PR for a fringe-sounding organization that wants to be taken seriously in public policy. Anyway, she probably already gets $BIGNUM requests for charity every day.
The Overcoming Bias comments thread contains a great discussion on whether it’s better to sign up for cryonics or give the extra money to SIAI or another charity. Michael, what do you think?
October 19th, 2007 at 7:25 am
Signing up for cryonics is a powerful statement and sets a positive example. Practically everyone can afford it. It’s an excellent conversation-starter.
On the other hand, preventing existential risk should be humanity’s #1 priority. But the conversation-starting, example-setting benefits of a cryonics contract seem to be worth the cost in this regard.
To make people want to participate in what you’re doing, you have to present a whole lifestyle and way of thinking. This cannot be done just by donating to a single charity and acting like everyone else otherwise.
The whole conversation is sort of a red herring because people casually throw away large amounts of money on non-cryonics things all the time. If we want to donate money to an important charity, how about we begin by buying a cheaper car, living in a more modest apartment, or stop buying all these “toys for big boys” that many of the wealthy men I know do?
There are many people of means in the transhumanist community who donate nothing. (You know who you are.) Meanwhile, our civilization is sliding towards intense techno-risk. If these people would take even the most modest action, it would make this conversation about cryonics cost irrelevant.
October 19th, 2007 at 8:21 am
Maybe I’m crazy, but I look on dying (permanently) as a good thing.
Sure, I want my life to be better, and I don’t mind if it’s longer than it would have otherwise been - but dying and then being revived at some point in the distant future doesn’t sound that attractive to me.
Also, I don’t have much faith that any cryonics company is going to do a good enough job for long enough to be viable - If I were to be frozen, the last thing I’d need is to be defrosted because of business failure or other like events. Not many people are going to stick up for the rights of a corpse at a bankruptcy hearing.
October 19th, 2007 at 8:34 am
Oh, good lord, if I find myself ported into the same virtuality as Paris Hilton I’ll hack the damn operating code and crash the entire thing. I will also make sure all of her code libraries are mysteriously corrupted before the system is brought back up so that she can manifest as little more than a two-dimensional cardboard cut-out.
October 19th, 2007 at 8:49 am
We have to remember that intelligence enhancement tech would likely be available by the time cryonic revivals are performed.
October 19th, 2007 at 10:50 am
Call me old fashioned if you wish, but I’d like to meet everybody eventually. That includes a lot of people that people don’t like. Sorry if that offends someone. I think it’s great that the possibility of eliminating death exists. Everyone is welcome in my virtual (as well as, real) universe.
October 19th, 2007 at 12:12 pm
A fool and her money are soon parted.
Check out the cryogenic suspension costs at http://www.cryonics.org/
The question which potential cryonauts should ask themselves is whether a greater good can be achieved by vainly seeking personal self-preservation via an unproven technology or by investing in organisations or charities which stand a much better chance of harnessing known methods of science, technology and economics to bring real improvements in quality of life to those still living.
As a counterpoint to the tens of thousands of dollars being spent by Paris Hilton on cryosuspension, check out the number of people in the world living under what are officially described as conditions of extreme poverty.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Percentage_population_living_on_less_than_1_dollar_day.png
October 19th, 2007 at 12:27 pm
This is going to be extremely bad PR for cryonics. People loved Ted Williams, but they mocked him when he did it. This will strengthen the image, in the public consciousness, that cryonics is for wackos.
October 19th, 2007 at 1:20 pm
I wonder who she’s been talking to about this. I seriously doubt she would take the time to research the subject without being prodded by someone else.
Martin Striz said: This is going to be extremely bad PR for cryonics. People loved Ted Williams, but they mocked him when he did it. This will strengthen the image, in the public consciousness, that cryonics is for wackos.
I’m a firm believer that any PR is good PR when you’re an unknown with a solid idea. The Ted Williams situation gained more press for the cryonics process than the previous decades combined. Even though most of the comments about it were negative and hostile (a common response to anything that breaks the status quo), it still garnered some positive press. Honestly, when was the last time a classic transhumanist issue got so much coverage?
The fact is, bringing *any* futuristic technology to the public eye is going to cause outrage. People freaked out over genetically modified food when it began receiving press coverage, but now it’s so commonplace that apthy has taken over . How are they going to react when someone develops a primitive AI? Or when the most basic of molecular nanotechnology arrives? That same future shock will be there, and the only way to assuage it will be to talk about it openly and frankly.
Worrying about PR at this point is a futile effort. Cryonicists are already considered fringe by most people. Barring a complete collapse of the industry, there’s really nowhere to go but up. Besides, once (if) that first patient is revived, everyone will be on the bandwagon. Proof of concept is the best PR around.
October 19th, 2007 at 2:46 pm
This is good news. This endorsement will only cause more people to mock cryonics even more for the foolish idea that it is.
October 19th, 2007 at 9:46 pm
Bob Mottram writes,
“As a counterpoint to the tens of thousands of dollars being spent by Paris Hilton on cryosuspension, check out the number of people in the world living under what are officially described as conditions of extreme poverty.”
I wish leftists would get their story straight. They want us to “live lightly upon the earth,” but who lives lighter than the people who manage on pennies a day? You’d think leftists would celebrate these people and hold them up as role models.
October 20th, 2007 at 2:57 am
Well I should make clear for the record that I’m not a leftist or a rightist, and don’t actually support or subscribe to the ideology of any political party. I’m more inclined towards singularitarianism. Personally I hope to see much of the political process as we know it today replaced by automation, since its core function seems to be one of optimal resource allocation.
October 21st, 2007 at 3:43 pm
Hmmm…interesting. This would seem to prove that Paris is not quite completely neo-cortically dead (which is important, as, otherwise, there’d really be nothing worth preserving…) . Good for you, Paris…and your little dog, too!
October 21st, 2007 at 9:36 pm
For those who dis Ms Hilton, remember that she personally generates over $3 million per year in income just for ‘being famous’. How many here even get close to those numbers?
She is a master of PR and the smartest dumb blonde in the world. Her foray in cryonics is a sign of her new course of action and can’t wait to see where she goes with this.
October 23rd, 2007 at 8:09 am
100 years? How about 50-60? Or more like 30 to 40, and for some less than 10…
October 23rd, 2007 at 8:24 am
Bob, cryonics is not expensive: it just requires a life insurance policy. For people my age, this is only a couple hundred dollars a year. The way you talk about cryonics shows you have a major bias against it. How is it “vain” to merely want to live longer than the meager ~80 years given to us by modern medicine? It’s not an either/or thing. The cost of cryonics for a 40 year-old is similar to a modest vacation… why would you get all hostile towards someone signing up for cryonics but not have that same hostility for a vacationer? Because vacations are socially sanctioned and cryonics is not, that’s why.
Stop applying the double standard.
Heartland, you’re against cryonics because… why?
Martin, we’ll see, but I strongly doubt it.
Some people seem to be oddly afraid of Paris Hilton showing up in the future, or somehow integrating it into their overall assessment of the future, but how would it be any harder to avoid her then than it is now? Like most celebrities, she is just experiencing her “time in the Sun” right now, but I doubt it will last very long. Regardless, every human life is important, right? It’s amazing how a mention of Paris Hilton can cause people to forget that she’s a human being like everyone else…
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:28 pm
[…] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptIndiana Insurance Online Blog wrote an interesting post today on Comment on Paris Hilton Signing Up for Cryonics by Michael AnissimovHere’sa quick excerptBob, cryonics is not expensive: it just requires a life insurance policy. … […]
October 24th, 2007 at 8:34 am
[…] Read the rest of this great post here […]
October 24th, 2007 at 2:24 pm
[…] Insurance » Comment on Paris Hilton Signing Up for Cryonics by Life Insurance Â&r… wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt… Insurance Online Blog wrote an interesting post today on Comment on Paris Hilton Signing Up for Cryonics by Michael AnissimovHere’sa quick excerptBob, cryonics is not expensive: it just requires a life insurance policy. … […] […]
October 26th, 2007 at 2:40 am
[…] admin wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptunknown wrote an interesting post today onHere’sa quick excerptIndiana Insurance Online Blog wrote an interesting post today on Comment on Paris Hilton Signing Up for Cryonics by Michael AnissimovHere’sa quick excerptBob, … […]
October 26th, 2007 at 2:40 am
[…] info@mobuzztv.com (MobuzzTV (Video)) wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt[…] Read the rest of this great post here […] […]
October 26th, 2007 at 1:39 pm
If we all put the money together, do you think we could have her turned into frostilicus right away?
November 5th, 2007 at 5:19 pm
We believe that intelligence, memories & personality are determined primarily by the structure & chemistry of the human brain.Our aim is to preserve the brain so faithfully that its unique identity will also be preserved,so that future science may be able to revive the individual.We realize that this is highly speculative, but we feel that human life is sufficiently precious to justify our attempt,even thought the outcome is unknown.
Discover how leading-edge science at the Alcor Life Extension Foundation is getting closer to making the dream of a vastly extended lifespan come true and how our notion of “death” is shifting. This video included interviews with world-renowned scientists including Dr.Aubrey de Grey, Department of Genetics at the University of Cambridge, explaining how life can be cryopreserved on the verge of death and then revitalized, giving us a second chance at a long and productive life, and Dr. Ralph Merkle, Distinguished Professor of Computing at Georgia Tech, exploring how molecular-sized machines will be able to repair damage to your body from aging or the devastating effects of cancer and other illnesses, including frostbite.
Mag & Steph from Quebec/CANADA
——————————
Alcor Members & Happy to take a chance for see the Futur !!!
December 3rd, 2007 at 11:07 am
If it is true,this is great news.
Human cryobiostasis needs famous and popular people to publicise and advocate it if it is to become generally accepted by the public and aquire the critical financial and political mass needed for long term survival.
May 12th, 2008 at 1:32 pm
Cryogenics… They still have no way to prevent cells to explode en masse while freezing.(I know, it`s just a matter of time before they find a way)
It will also not be a simple case of frostbite repair.What COULD be possible is rebuilding from DNA(Yes, cloning), and maybe recreate the personality from repaired brain tissue…maybe..
Only ONE teensy problem with rebuilding miss Hilton from hopefully un-damaged DNA. She`ll get her pre-barbie plastic surgery face/body back. That`ll be quite a shock I imagine.
On a personal note: I`much more interested if, or, more likely, whèn they find the kill-switch, built in our cells. That`ll be much more useful than trying to fix thousands of Human-popsicles.
May 12th, 2008 at 1:34 pm
It’s cryonics
Google vitrification
You can’t rebuild cognitive content just from DNA
Your understanding of biology is fail
July 17th, 2008 at 3:02 am
Fat tits cumshot….
Fat tits cumshot….
August 3rd, 2008 at 10:17 am
Yay! Interesting…
November 3rd, 2008 at 12:27 am
Soma ship to florida….
Soma ship to florida. Soma shipped to florida….