List of Prominent Transhumanist-Receptive Thinkers, 2008 Wednesday, Feb 6 2008
transhumanism 4:29 pm
Here is a list of prominent people who take transhumanist ideas seriously enough to either discuss them or (more rarely) fear them. For those new to this blog, “transhumanism” is briefly defined in this post. By extension, people on this list have also been exposed to the idea of abrupt or accelerating technological change, though not necessarily technological change that “transcends stakeholder politics”. The object of this list is to show that transhumanist topics have become acceptable for mainstream discussion in recent years.
1. Bill Clinton, former US President, who recommended The Age of Spiritual Machines to the audience at a talk at the Brainstorm 2001 conference. He called the book a “compelling view of the future” and lamented political leaders “out of touch” with the acceleration of technology.
2. Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, who called Ray Kurzweil “the best person I know at predicting the future of artificial intelligence”. Gates’ writings on robotics indicate he expects massive technological change in the near future.
3. Richard A. Clarke, top US counter-terrorism adviser turned science fiction author. His 2007 novel Breakpoint takes a pro-transhumanist stance and mentions the movement by name.
4. Bill Joy, co-founder of Sun Microsystems, who expresses apprehension of transhumanist technologies in his landmark WIRED article, Why the future doesn’t need us.
5. Marvin Minsky, co-founder of MIT’s AI laboratory, who Isaac Asimov called one of the smart people he ever met. Minsky frequently discusses cryonics and human-level artificial intelligence.
6. Leon Kass, former chair of the President’s Council on Bioethics from 2002–2005, whose seriousness and opposition towards transhumanism is outlined in the report Beyond Therapy, among other writings.
7. Stephen Hawking, theoretical physicist, who advocates genetic engineering of humans to prevent AIs from “taking over the world”. In Scientific American, Hawking wrote an article promoting a transhumanist vision of the future.
8. David D. Friedman, anarcho-capitalist and law professor at Santa Clara University. His recent book Future Perfect deals with transhumanist themes, and he has been writing on the topics for over two decades.
9. Peter Thiel, co-founder of Paypal and early investor in Facebook. Thiel financed SIAI’s Singularity Summit and has offered $3.5 million in matching funds to the Methuselah Foundation.
10. Steve Jurvetson, a leading Silicon Valley venture capitalist as Managing Director of Draper Fischer Jurvetson. Jurvetson’s blog, the J-Curve, discusses accelerating change, superintelligence, synthetic life, biotechnology, nanotechnology, and other transhumanist themes.
There are many others, but ten should be enough for now. The point is: don’t be afraid to bring up transhumanist topics with fellow intellectuals, at work or at home. The folks above probably all have a lot to lose, but they mention the issues with candor. By the same token, their high esteem may make others tolerant of quirky inclinations they may have, but the general response to these discussions has been positive, not dismissive.




This is all so. But not one of these great people has stepped foward to take the lead. I mean who has the right stuff to focus the power of humanity on the right issues. In the book “The Singularity is near” Bill Gates and Ray Kurzweil mention that we need a charismatic leader(read messiah).
Someone please step foward. Be my technical jesus.
Actually, no. Kurzweil writes “A charismatic leader is part of the old model. That’s something we want to get away from.”
You ought to continue your quote with BILL Gates’ response:
“Okay, a charismatic computer then.
RAY: How about a charismatic operating system?”
Their point and mine is, we need a conscious entity to bring attention to technological possibilities and to lead our efforts.
I am just guessing, but maybe you are thinking a hive mind would be best. If so, I see the truth in it.
humans and technology blend? Not all technology is good technology. I suppose I am a technological pessimist. It is very interesting that this list of people should appear. Most of the names are not too surprising. imagine how rich they would get and based on trans humanism…would live longer and be able to dominate markets longer. where IS the human race headed? Will everyone enjoy the laps of luxurious living with technological bodies? I doubt it highly. For those of you who think this is a decent route for humanity…get on a space ship and go to another planet…non-human life will not be tolerated. Just imagine how easy it would be to guve someone a virus with nanotechnology.
Stephen Hawking denies god. Well, Mr. Hawking, if there is no god, how do you explain puppies and rainbows?! Oh. Science, you say… Oh.
So what did he say? RT @LiaMilan: i disagree with Stephen Hawking . ! because
Stephen Hawking roll urself down a hill ya nob… I don't like u at all
The world is reaching a point where we will have to ask ourshelves what we are. Technology will give us the ability to change mankind for the better, but many of what we have created has turned against us. We must work in two paths: creating the technology and regulating the use.