Have an Unspeakably Evil Lovecraft Day Saturday, Mar 15 2008
random 12:53 pm

Oh hell yes! Today is the 71st anniversary of the death of H.P. Lovecraft. This genius is one of my favorite authors. He even had his own literary movement, Cosmicism:
“The philosophy of cosmicism states that there is no recognizable divine presence, such as God, in the universe, and that humans are particularly insignificant in the larger scheme of intergalactic existence, and perhaps are just a small species projecting their own mental idolatries onto the vast cosmos, ever susceptible to being wiped from existence at any moment. This also suggested that the majority of undiscerning humanity are creatures with the same significance as insects in a much greater struggle between greater forces which, due to humanity’s small, visionless and unimportant nature, it does not recognize.”
I don’t necessarily agree with Cosmicism, but find it fascinating. Sometimes I see it as a metaphor for human civilization playing with immensely powerful emerging technologies beyond our ability to control, like nanotech and AI. 67 Lovecraft stories are available at the Gutenberg Project. Some of my favorites are The Colour Out of Space, The Dunwich Horror, and Beyond the Wall of Sleep. I’ve read about half of these and hope to read them all.
Lovecraft was much more than just a horror writer. He was a philosopher, a poet, an occultist. His goal was not merely to scare you, like thousands of trashy horror movies, but to make you think. Some of the concepts he presents are utterly amazing, and he is never afraid to inject his own personal quirks into the characters of his stories. And now, something extremely mysterious, and rarely seen… a picture of H.P. Lovecraft… smiling!!!





H.P. Lovecraft is the best support I can think of for limited copyright terms. If it weren’t for a few technicalities, most of his work would *still* be under copyright, even though he died over seventy years ago.
That last photograph strikes me as quite creepy.
May I recommend both Olaf Stapledon’s writings for Cosmicism with tragedy vice nihilishm, and Colavito’s “The Cult of Alien Gods: H.P. Lovecraft And Extraterrestial Pop Culture” for dear HPL’s cultural effects?
And I assume you know about this…
Any mention of Grandpa Theobald always puts me into Self-Promotion Mode. If you’d like, check out my series of Lovecraftian novellas at Footnotes to the Human Species. I’ve set the bar pretty high for myself: all of the stories that I’m writing for the series are set in the milieu HPL created collectively in his stories, so they’re more like extremely morbid and depressive sci-fi than traditional horror stories.
In the story I’m currently serializing, “City of Pillars”, 9/11 is an attack by Azifist (Cthulhu cultist) terrorists who use the plane-crash attacks to unleash a Dunwich-Horror-esque horror on Manhattan, leading to utterly jawdropping amounts of destruction. The story bounces back between a present press junket to the Island, the remains of Manhattan, and the actual destruction itself…and by the end, readers are sure to be asking themselves, “Which is worse? The events of 9/11 or the stuff that’s happening now in the ashen ruins of Manhattan?”
Hey thanks for naming what is to be my belief system for probably a while. Good to know there is a name for a case of extreme anomia.
I enjoyed reading Joyce Carol Oates’ Lovecraft profile in the New York of Books.
Initially I hesitated posting this link because I didn’t know whether Michael would mind a piece which is, however subtly argued, critical of Lovecraft. But since I see that he mentions The Genetics of Horror: Sex and Racism in H.P. Lovecraft’s Fiction on his del.icio.us page, I think I can rest assured.
Quotation from the article by Joyce Carol Oates:
Readers of genre fiction, unlike readers of what we presume to call “literary fiction,” assume a tacit contract between themselves and the writer: they understand that they will be manipulated, but the question is how? and when? and with what skill? and to what purpose? However plot-ridden, fantastical, or absurd, populated by whatever pseudo-characters, genre fiction is always resolved, while “literary fiction” makes no such promises; there is no contract between reader and writer for, in theory at least, each work of literary fiction is original, and, in essence, “about” its own language; anything can happen, or, upon occasion, nothing. Genre fiction is addictive, literary fiction, unfortunately, is not.
That’s because Genre fiction is //good//, whereas literary fiction, unfortunately, is not.
Silly English Lit majors!
Herbert West: Reanimator, Cool Air and From Beyond (kinda), just to name a few, are proto-transhumanist classics.
The more I read Lovecraft the more I see these connections. His writing ages very well, in my opinion.
yeah!!! :D
Speaking of HPL, do you know this:
http://generationscience-fiction.hautetfort.com/archive/2008/07/23/ils-ont-fait-rire-h-p-lovecraft.html
[...] via Accelerating Future; Lovecraft looks more like Stephen Fry than I would have [...]
I highly doubt he was an occultist. It was his obsessive fanbase that created that so called “cult” around the Cthulhu phenomenon.
And btw, that photo isn’t so rare as you can just Google HP Lovecraft and it comes up.
smiling? he was a practical joker!!!
Have loved this man and his work since I was very young. Still do. I remember, after reading “The Dunwich Horror,” running around the house and locking all the doors and windows. Then I thought, if there really was anything out there such as lovecraft described, locking the doors and windows wouldn’t keep it out!