Conference on Global Catastrophic Risks Wednesday, May 28 2008
risks 10:46 pm
The branding of catastrophic risk as a globe on fire makes me snicker a bit.
Categories:
- AI (66)
- anthropics (3)
- bioethics (4)
- biology (10)
- brain (9)
- chemistry (3)
- comics (4)
- cryonics (3)
- cybernetics (2)
- events (8)
- friendly ai (35)
- futurism (45)
- images (29)
- intelligence (12)
- interviews (12)
- life extension (18)
- lifeboat (8)
- meta (28)
- nanotechnology (62)
- nuclear (3)
- philosophy (25)
- physics (8)
- random (33)
- rationality (2)
- religion (4)
- risks (77)
- robotics (16)
- science (3)
- SIAI (2)
- singularity (75)
- space (26)
- superintelligence (4)
- technology (36)
- transhumanism (110)
- treaties (2)
- videos (9)
- warfare (2)
- web 2.0 (12)
Monthly:
- November 2008 (1)
- October 2008 (4)
- September 2008 (15)
- August 2008 (14)
- June 2008 (17)
- May 2008 (59)
- April 2008 (31)
- March 2008 (45)
- February 2008 (27)
- January 2008 (3)
- December 2007 (5)
- November 2007 (7)
- October 2007 (30)
- September 2007 (18)
- August 2007 (11)
- July 2007 (24)
- June 2007 (20)
- May 2007 (23)
- April 2007 (27)
- March 2007 (29)
- February 2007 (11)
- January 2007 (26)
- December 2006 (22)
- November 2006 (44)
- October 2006 (27)
- September 2006 (28)
- August 2006 (39)
- July 2006 (9)
- June 2006 (6)
- May 2006 (9)
- April 2006 (6)
- March 2006 (9)
- February 2006 (3)
- January 2006 (16)
RSS Feeds:
Technorati:
Email Michael:
June 1st, 2008 at 9:30 am
The branding of catastrophic risk as a globe on fire makes me snicker a bit.
Ha, looks to me more like pacman got a power-up.
The preferred logo, consisting of a 1″ by 1″ etching of a billion distinct tiny people screaming in agony as nanobots tear off their flesh, will (ironically) only be feasible once nanotechnology becomes more advanced.