A teoria básica do Corpo Astral situa-se na palavra grega aster que significa estrela, então a alma seria envolvida por este invólucro semelhantes ao das estrelas, também foi chamado no passado de Corpo Sideral……

Giving a name to an existing concept is a trivial accomplishment. The value of the schematic depends on how specific and distant from the trivial it is – does this paper go beyond a representation of recursive improvement that could be easily produced by many people?

“(2) He identified the problem of “Friendly AI” and gave it that name.”

He did not identify the problem; others covered the same ground much earlier, and actually went much farther than Eliezer has done. Again, giving a name to something is not a particularly impressive accomplishment, especially when you cannot clearly establish what that thing is.

“Whether you agree with his prescriptions or not, we now have a name for the problem and its solution.”

I can make up names for a problem and its solution right now. Here: xenthisism and multiblem scorbitol. But if I can’t tell you clearly what those things are, or even provide suggestions as to how you might find out, all I’ve done is made up two phrases.

“(3) He proposed a solution to the Friendliness problem, namely Coherent Extrapolated Volition”

No, CEV is the hypothesis that a solution can be found by certain undefined methods applied to the population of human moral beliefs. It is not clear what methods would be used, or whether any methods can produce a solution from human moral beliefs. It’s not even clear precisely what the problem is – no defined explanation has ever been given.

ievexcnl…

Btw..my apology..I forgot to mention that i’ve seen Eliezer within the context of the Singularity summit and find that his performance was very much up to par. My opinion was based solely on being in the general public eye.