Comprehensive Copying Not Required for Uploading

Recently, there was some confusion by biologist P.Z. Myers regarding the Whole Brain Emulation Roadmap report of Anders Sandberg and Nick Bostrom at the Future of Humanity Institute.

The confusion arose when Prof. Myers made incorrect assumptions about the 130-page roadmap from reading a 2-page blog post by Chris Hallquist. Hallquist wrote:

The version of the uploading idea: take a preserved dead brain, slice it into very thin slices, scan the slices, and build a computer simulation of the entire brain.

If this process manages to give you a sufficiently accurate simulation

Prof. Myers objected vociferously, writing, “It won’t. It can’t.”, subsequently launching into a reasonable attack against the notion of scanning a living human brain at nanoscale resolution with current fixation technology. The confusion is that Prof. Myers is criticizing a highly specific idea, the notion of exhaustively simulating every axon and dendrite in a live brain, as if that were the only proposal or even the central proposal forwarded by Sandberg and Bostrom. In fact, on page 13 of the report, the authors present a table that includes 11 progressively more detailed “levels of emulation”, ranging from simulating the brain using high-level representational “computational modules” to simulating the quantum behavior of individual molecules. In his post, Myers writes as if the 5th level of detail, simulating all axons and dendrites, is the only path to whole brain emulation (WBE) proposed in the report (it isn’t), and also as if the authors are proposing that WBE of the human brain is possible with present-day fixation techniques (they aren’t).

In fact, the report presents Whole Brain Emulation as a technological goal with a wide range of possible routes to its achievement. The narrow method that Myers criticizes is only one approach among many, and not one that I would think is particularly likely to work. In the comments section, Myers concurs that another approach to WBE could work perfectly well:

This whole slice-and-scan proposal is all about recreating the physical components of the brain in a virtual space, without bothering to understand how those components work. We’re telling you that approach requires an awfully fine-grained simulation.

An alternative would be to, for instance, break down the brain into components, figure out what the inputs and outputs to, say, the nucleus accumbens are, and then model how that tissue processes it all (that approach is being taken with models of portions of the hippocampus). That approach doesn’t require a detailed knowledge of what every molecule in the tissue is doing.

But the method described here is a brute force dismantling and reconstruction of every cell in the brain. That requires details of every molecule.

But, the report does not mandate that a “brute force dismantling and reconstruction of every cell in the brain” is the only way forward for uploading. This makes it look as if Myers did not read the report, even though he claims, “I read the paper”.

Slicing and scanning a brain will be necessary but by no means sufficient to create a high-detail Whole Brain Emulation. Surely, it is difficult to imagine how the salient features of a brain could be captured without scanning it in some way.

What Myers seems to be objecting to is a kind of dogmatic reductionism, “brain in, emulation out” direct scanning approach that is not actually being advocated by the authors of the report. The report is non-dogmatic, writing that a two-phase approach to WBE is required, where “The first phase consists of developing the basic capabilities and settling key research questions that determine the feasibility, required level of detail and optimal techniques. This phase mainly involves partial scans, simulations and integration of the research modalities.” In this first phase, there is ample room for figuring out what the tissue actually does. Then, that data can be used simplify the scanning and representation process. The required level of understanding vs. blind scan-and-simulate is up for debate, but few would claim that our current neuroscientific level of understanding suffices.

Describing the difficulties of comprehensive scanning, Myers writes:

And that’s another thing: what the heck is going to be recorded? You need to measure the epigenetic state of every nucleus, the distribution of highly specific, low copy number molecules in every dendritic spine, the state of molecules in flux along transport pathways, and the precise concentration of all ions in every single compartment. Does anyone have a fixation method that preserves the chemical state of the tissue?

Measuring the epigenetic state of every nucleus is not likely to be required to create convincing, useful, and self-aware Whole Brain Emulations. No neuroscientist familiar with the idea has ever claimed this. The report does not claim this, either. Myers seems to be inferring this claim himself through his interpretation of Hallquist’s brusque 2-sentence summary of the 130-page report. Hallquist’s sentences need not be interpreted this way — “slicing and scanning” the brain could be done simply to map neural network patterns rather than to capture the epigenetic state of every nucleus.

Next, Myers objects to the idea that brain emulations could operate at faster-than-human speeds. He responds to a passage in “Intelligence Explosion: Evidence and Import”, another paper cited in the Hallquist post which claims, “Axons carry spike signals at 75 meters per second or less (Kandel et al. 2000). That speed is a fixed consequence of our physiology. In contrast, software minds could be ported to faster hardware, and could therefore process information more rapidly.” To this, Myers says:

You’re just going to increase the speed of the computations — how are you going to do that without disrupting the interactions between all of the subunits? You’ve assumed you’ve got this gigantic database of every cell and synapse in the brain, and you’re going to just tweak the clock speed… how? You’ve got varying length constants in different axons, different kinds of processing, different kinds of synaptic outputs and receptor responses, and you’re just going to wave your hand and say, “Make them go faster!” Jebus. As if timing and hysteresis and fatigue and timing-based potentiation don’t play any role in brain function; as if sensory processing wasn’t dependent on timing. We’ve got cells that respond to phase differences in the activity of inputs, and oh, yeah, we just have a dial that we’ll turn up to 11 to make it go faster.

At first read, it almost seems in this objection as if Prof. Myers does not understand the concept that software can be run faster if it is running on a faster computer. After reading this post carefully, it doesn’t seem as if this is what he actually means, but since the connotation is there, the point is worth addressing directly.

Software is a series of electric signals passing through logic gates on computers. The software is agnostic to the processing speed of the underlying computer. The software is a pattern of electrons. The pattern is there whether the clock speed of the processor is 2 kHz or 2 GHz. When and if software is ported from a 2 kHz computer to a 2 GHz computer, it does not stand up and object to this “tweaking the clock speed”. No “waving of hands” is required. The software may very well be unable to detect that the substrate has changed. Even if it can detect the change, it will have no impact on its functioning unless the programmers especially write code that makes it react.

Speed change in software is allowed. If the hardware can support the speed change, pressing a button is all it takes to speed the software up. This is a simple point.

The crux of Myers’ objection seems to actually be about the interaction of the simulation with the environment. This objection makes much more sense. In the comments, Carl Shulman responds to Myers’ objection:

This seems to assume, contrary to the authors, running a brain model at increased speeds while connected to real-time inputs. For a brain model connected to inputs from a virtual environment, the model and the environment can be sped up by the same factor: running the exact same programs (brain model and environment) on a faster (serial speed) computer gets the same results faster. While real-time interaction with the outside would not be practicable at such speedup, the accelerated models could still exchange text, audio, and video files (and view them at high speed-up) with slower minds.

Here, there seems to be a simple misunderstanding on Myers’ part, where he is assuming that Whole Brain Emulations would have to be directly connected to real-world environments rather than virtual environments. The report (and years of informal discussion on WBE among scientists) more or less assumes that interaction with the virtual environment would be the primary stage in which the WBE would operate, with sensory information from an (optional) real-world body layered onto the VR environment as an addendum. As the report describes, “The environment simulator maintains a model of the surrounding environment, responding to actions from the body model and sending back simulated sensory information. This is also the most convenient point of interaction with the outside world. External information can be projected into the environment model, virtual objects with real world affordances can be used to trigger suitable interaction etc.”

It is unlikely that an arbitrary WBE would be running at a speed that lines it up precisely with the 200 Hz firing rate of human neurons, the rate at which we think. More realistically, the emulation is likely to be much slower or much faster than the characteristic human rate, which exists as a tiny sliver in a wide expanse of possible mind-speeds. It would be far more reasonable — and just easier — to run the WBE in a virtual environment with a speed suited to its thinking speed. Otherwise, the WBE would perceive the world around it running at either a glacial pace or a hyper-accelerated one, and have a difficult time making much sense of either.

Since the speed of the environment can be smoothly scaled with the speed of the WBE, the problems that Myers cites with respect to “turn[ing] it up to 11″ can be duly avoided. If the mind is turned up to 11, which is perfectly possible given adequate computational resources, then the virtual environment can be turned up to 11 as well. After all, the computational resources required to simulate a detailed virtual environment would pale in comparison to those required to simulate the mind itself. Thus, the mind can be turned up to 11, 12, 13, 14, or far beyond with the push of a button, to whatever level the computing hardware can support. Given the historic progress of computing hardware, this may well eventually be thousands or even millions of times the human rate of thinking. Considering minds that think and innovate a million times faster than us might be somewhat intimidating, but there it is, a direct result of the many intriguing and counterintuitive consequences of physicalism.

Comments

  1. Michael,

    I haven’t read the original Roadmap, but I think what Myers was trying to say is that architecture of both the mind and brain reflects the speed constraints imposed by firing rates, refractory periods, etc. Since these constraints are baked in, porting the mind to a supercomputer and then speeding everything up will cause problems. I don’t think this is a particularly strong objection, but by analogy, imagine if every car on the high was suddenly going 200 miles per hour. Neither the drivers, the cars, or the roads are built to handle this kind of speed. We’d expect to see fatal crashes every few seconds. Software may be agnostic to the underlying hardware, but that’s also software designed specifically for computers, not software that evolved.

    Do you not think the mind might different?

  2. Dan Lewis

    Trent:

    A computer simulation is “software designed specifically for computers,” regardless of what system it simulates. In a highway simulation, the (simulated) cars travel the same number of simulated miles per simulated hour irrespective of the number of wall-clock seconds it takes to compute one second of the simulation. An orbital mechanics simulation doesn’t need to spend a real-time year to compute the positions of the planets one year in the future any more than it needs to run on a computer the size of the solar system.

  3. Toma

    Sorry for being slightly off-topic, but I do question the whole premise of mind uploading. Wouldn’t it be much more conducive to the evolution of humankind and the universe as a whole, if we strove for the fusion of all conscious minds? Individual conscious minds might still be good for sex, but for all other purposes I don’t see the value.

  4. Jay

    You’ve gotta be thankful that Myers is setting himself up as the enemy. Any good idea needs to have opponents. The role Myers’ takes on in this really does a lot to validate the concept of whole brain emulation.

  5. Generally speaking I don’t find P.Z. Myers to have anything worthwhile to say that’s not strictly on the subject of biology (which neuroscience is not). He seems to think he’s an expert on everything though, which is why I stopped reading his blog–too many stupid rants.

    I don’t mean to go into a character attack instead of responding to the argument. But I’ve already wasted too much of my time responding to stupid things Myers has said.

  6. I like this website its a master peace ! Glad I identified this on google .

  7. Erika Proehl

    Needed to compose you a tiny note to finally thank you very much yet again for your personal splendid methods you have discussed above. It is strangely open-handed with people like you to provide publicly all that a number of people would have marketed as an electronic book to generate some bucks for their own end, primarily now that you could possibly have tried it if you ever wanted.

  8. Keep up the good piece of work, I read few articles on this web site and I think that your web blog is rattling interesting and contains sets of wonderful info .

  9. It’s any shame you do not have a donate button! I’d without a doubt donate to the brilliant blog! I suppose in the meantime i’ll settle for book-marking and also adding your Rss feed to my own Google accounts. I expect fresh updates and can talk about this website using my Fb group. Chat quickly!

  10. Wonderful post will likely be posting this on my blog today keep up the great function.

  11. This web page is often a walk-through its the internet you wanted about this and didn’t know who to question. Glimpse here, and you will definitely discover it.

  12. i love to obtain birthday cards specially if they are custom built birthday cards~

  13. Good post. I learn something new and challenging on blogs I stumbleupon on a daily basis. It will always be interesting to read through content from other authors and practice a little something from other sites.

  14. The more interesting question for me is how to create general intelligence that isn’t so difficult to reproduce, like this is. A focus of many resources not that unlike distributed uses of individual computers’ processing ability would, eventually, give a lot of support for picking apart the workings of the human mind which is a very particular brand of intelligent activity. General AI, expert systems, and general mish-mashes of computing resources (intelligent ‘components’ of code “working together”) would be able to refine themselves continuously and become more suited to solving these sorts of problems. That kind of engineering is more important, I think.

  15. jo

    Specializing knowledge some people having a greater understanding of a body of information than others and can process that material faster. Use theses more advanced at processing minds, Then attempt this mapping. Perhaps this process, may boost acceleration.

  16. I like this website so much, saved to my bookmarks. “Nostalgia isn’t what it used to be.” by Peter De Vries.

  17. Hello my family member! I want to say that this post is awesome, nice written and come with approximately all important infos. I’d like to see extra posts like this.

  18. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own weblog and was curious what all is required to get setup? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very internet savvy so I’m not 100% sure. Any tips or advice would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks

  19. Thanks – Enjoyed this post, can I set it up so I receive an update sent in an email when you publish a fresh update?

  20. It is in reality a nice and helpful piece of info. I’m happy that you shared this helpful information with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

  21. Admiring the persistence you put into your website and detailed information you provide. It’s nice to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same old rehashed information. Great read! I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m including your RSS feeds to my Google account.

  22. Thank you for helping out, superb info. “If you would convince a man that he does wrong, do right. Men will believe what they see.” by Henry David Thoreau.

  23. Attractive element of content. I just stumbled upon your weblog and in accession capital to claim that I get in fact loved account your blog posts. Anyway I’ll be subscribing for your feeds or even I fulfillment you get right of entry to persistently fast.

  24. I beloved as much as you will receive carried out proper here. The comic strip is tasteful, your authored material stylish. nonetheless, you command get bought an edginess over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell no doubt come further before once more since exactly the same nearly very frequently inside case you defend this increase.

  25. very nice post, i certainly love this web site, keep on itsome tips here!

  26. I think that other sorts of web page lovers should certainly consider this valuable internet site as a model. Highly clean and simple to use styling, coupled with first-rate subject matter! You are a pro operating in this particular niche :)

  27. Can I just say what a aid to search out somebody who really knows what theyre speaking about on the internet. You undoubtedly know the best way to convey a difficulty to light and make it important. More people have to learn this and understand this side of the story. I cant imagine youre no more common since you definitely have the gift.Useful info!

  28. Good post. I be taught one thing more difficult on completely different blogs everyday. It would at all times be stimulating to read content material from other writers and follow slightly something from their store. I’d choose to make use of some with the content on my weblog whether you don’t mind. Natually I’ll offer you a link on your web blog. Thanks for sharing.Useful info!

  29. When I originally commented I clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get four emails with the same comment. Is there any approach you may take away me from that service? Thanks!

  30. WONDERFUL Post.thanks for share..more wait .. …some tips here!

  31. My dream retirement just includes that I’m able bodied enough to enjoy it. I suppose I’d just like to live by water.

  32. Thanks to the backlink with podcast.

  33. Alege elegant si simplu, alege online! Rochii Online iti aduce cele mai noi colectii de rochii din Marea Britanie. Indiferent daca esti in cautare de: Rochii de Ocazie, Rochii Club, Rochii de Vara 2012 sau Rochii Office Rochii Online este locul potrivit. Preturi mici si calitate maxima, numai pe RochiiOnline.me. Reduceri la doar un click distanta. Alege eficient si elegant!

  34. The sickest I’ve ever played! We played untill morning time last night!

  35. Thank you for having a awesome blog.

  36. Hi, I do believe this is an excellent site. I stumbledupon it ;) I will return yet again since I book-marked it. Money and freedom is the greatest way to change, may you be rich and continue to help others.

  37. It is truly a nice and useful piece of information. I am satisfied that you just shared this useful information with us. Please stay us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

  38. Most Indian cities employ a team, independent of the second major city within Los Angeles, in addition to San Antonio, Georgia, in the state and the suburban area are definitely not a team This Bally brand happens to be owned by typically the Labelux Group,wholesale jerseys nike china, which may be based in Caslano, Swiss Bill aim, over at TKoFYH, can be well-taken: Orlok is concerned around the terrors which in turn don book the movie crafting purely ” sci fi “-ish monsters dated, but in the ma

  39. This makes it straightforward for video and audio substance on your laptop to be streamed to the Blu-Ray Musician (possibly easily or with the Ethernet connection)we’re looking to find bargain nfl jerseysThat 49ers include things like 13 trust randomly picks out and even have the capability to progress at the round of golf provided by that firepower they provide perhaps with 5 arbitrarily chooses utilizing the top notch 93The appearance of the all new Meadowlands Stadium’s bid is certainly “Make

  40. That s the lowest price yet for an iPad giving you the full iPad experience for under $300, said Schiller. The tablet market is a really tough market to be in from a margin perspective, it s really hard to make money, she said. I think for Apple, its angle is to drive in more devices into households and developing loyalty, and not going after the consumer who will only ever pay $99 and not ever download an app, or buy the next Apple device. DIGITAL ACCESS ON ALL YOUR DEVICES. The mini tablet wil

  41. Network marketing Home business enterprise Body Robust Difference In Online promotion!There is the one amazing variance you need your mind all around if you have are provided on line to attempt to acquire some creates ones Multilevel marketing Work-from-home business. There are numerous issues in between managing a person’s Mlm marketing work-from-home business on the internet and performing it all outside of the internet,Tory Burch Outlet! However large main difference is that often and we don’

  42. Improve your Probabilities of Talking By making use of Telephone systems ChairnsThere a wide range of fees that your organization must dedicate directly into, so as to make realistic opportunities to successfully building sales and perhaps allowing the prospect about driving a car potent money. When searching during one of the overpriced business expenses every one of organizations expected to put money into,Burberry Outlet Store, it could most frequently be seen using the using communicating. A

  43. The game Best Undoubtedly are a Adaptive Alternative for Several an event,Juicy Couture OutletGolf very best include absolutely developed your grade, together with their visit enlarges far beyond any green. Such relaxed, sport-friendly tops are getting more or less choosing business typical community. Yow will discover sales agents or perhaps saleswomen dressed in world of golf tops in a wide array regarding industries, such as family car aspects suppliers,Ugg Boots Clearance, exclusive caution

  44. Considerably improved Tackle Finder Program Gains Global recognition Amid E-Commerce Website OwnersOnline looking around has become the most current phenomenon. Every body looks like it’s choosing bags, fashion accessories, boots and just what certainly not out of the several web shops that happen to be cashing on that easy hunting process. Though people who own this kind of e-commerce webpages are happy that the check out is undoubtedly going to constantly, the things a number of masters have b

  45. Purchasing a Term OfferMany men and women aspire to secure life assurance; nevertheless,Burberry Outlet Online, this is not possible by reason of numerous elements. Of them, various do not possess insurance policy they do not recognize how to get it. Some people in spite of this, simply can’t afford doing it. In other instances, you will discover folks who are not aware of what exactly insurance policies are,Karen Millen Dresses, where they ought to be skilled when it comes to insurance policies

  46. Find out how to grow your earnings utilising the ebay affiliate network shipping and delivery,Spyder OutletOnline marketing increasingly becoming a lot more widespread worldwide also in the UK these people currently be the reason for an astounding 17% in all retail industry marketing. If your corporation simply deals on line, or if you have never considered online sales until now,UGG Boots Outlet, it’s actually a wise decision to investigate the possible advantages of choosing online stores for

  47. Cutting-edge Scaffolding For being an Benefit In excess of Common Scaffolding,Burberry Outlet StoreBamboos, wood pallets as well as rules tend to be the add-ons which utilized for the traditional scaffold. Any issues enjoy using tremendous work, time and expense have got eventually stored such scaffold separate. The protection for the workers can also be a principal interest whilst installing scaffolding all over any building regarding engineering or perhaps remodel needs.With regular improve ar

  48. The Argentina lashes are on each party of the jacket and the entry side qualities an padded badge for this team and so the back edge features the golfer name combined with number used on him A new fact-obsessed school creator Gradgrind was a appropriate reminder merchandise happens when educational services becomes micro-managed; these lisping circus get better at Sleary was a joy; the put-upon weaver Stephen Blackpool (in reference to his scarily accurate alcoholic wife) fell apart my heart and

  49. Affiliate marketing online Throughout your Website — The way to still do itAffiliate internet marketing on your website is not really complicated. It is easy to benefit considerably for those who treat it the proper way. Certainly, if you should appearance carefully,Karen Millen Dresses, sit-ups and crunches almost all of the the blogosphere available on the market however fight with the particular internet programs they’re just working to run on their blogs. What exactly possessing rid of it?

Leave a Comment

Awesome! You've decided to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated.

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>