Interview with Dr. Steel Wednesday, Aug 13 2008 

Dr. Phineas Waldolf Steel is a mentally twisted but awe-inspiring figure whose interests span the production of propaganda, the construction of chronically malfunctioning robots, puppet shows, and an ongoing attempt to become World Emperor for the purpose of turning this planet into a Utopian Playland. His growing movement aims to move beyond conflict and war to forge a world that makes fun the top priority. His multi-faceted persona is an example of what people can do when they are highly creative in a variety of cultural areas.

Dr. Steel is an entertainer, leader, musician, artist, and thinker. If you’re interested in finding out more about him, check out his website. The laboratory in the toyland section is particularly entertaining. As an independent artist, Dr. Steel hasn’t sold out to any record companies yet, though I’m sure that he would accept a big contract if it were part of his master plan for world domination. His music has been described as “hip-hop industrial opera”, which is correct in the abstract, though I’d also add “experimental”. Imagine nerdcore intermixed with assorted sampling, nutty beatboxing, guitars, reed instruments, choirs, and an accordion.

Dr. Steel is no stranger to transhumanism, as you’ll see in our interview. He has written songs called “Build the Robots” and “The Singularity” that serve as his odes to all things robotic and post-biological. You can get the mp3s from his latest album here, or all three here. Dr. Steel is one among a growing group of transhumanist musicians and artists.

In a world of pre-packaged, corporatized, formula-driven entertainment, I find Dr. Steel to be refreshingly different and rebellious. I was so intrigued by his self-presentation and approach to the world that I had to sit down and ask him a few questions. They begin below the image.

Accelerating Future (AF): Dr. Steel, have you heard of transhumanism? Do you consider yourself a transhumanist?

STEEL: Absolutely, I do consider myself a transhumanist. The desire to transcend biology, as Ray Kurzweil is known for saying, remains at the forefront of my consciousness. I am frequently frustrated with the limitations of my current, physical form and I foresee great possibilities as we evolve into electronic life.

AF: Some of us think that the fastest way to get really useful robots is to build an artificial intelligence that designs these robots for us. Given your checkered past in robot development, have you considered this option?

STEEL: Indeed, there will come a time when artificial super intelligence will be able to out-think and out-perform us. To see “the robots building robots building robots” is one way of refining the evolution and development of technology based life. However, I am most interested in integrating our consciousness into this technology. To be able to back-up one’s brain and utilize this as the basis of such creations will allow us to integrate ourselves into the next step of existence. Our creativity is our greatest power, and in fact this is what I believe the true purpose of the universe is; to create. Humans have been able to harness this ability in unique ways and to build upon that by upgrading ourselves will be the key to moving into a new field of infinite possibilities.

AF: In your video of robotics you mention nanotechnology. If you could use advanced futuristic nanobots for one application, what would it be?

STEEL: Oh goodness, there are so many possibilities. Though, for the fun factor I would have to go with the use of foglets. These clusters of nanobots programmed to manifest in their designated form could prove very useful indeed. Be it the replication of a Tyrannosaurus Rex or a very comfortable arm chair, foglets could provide hours of maniacal entertainment.

AF: One of the biggest challenges of space travel would be isolation from the bulk of society and absence of an Internet connection. What would you do to amuse yourself on a long journey through space?

STEEL: It’s interesting, what you describe as a challenge reads a bit like a vacation in my book. I would, however, require a great deal of reading and writing material. Such a journey would certainly give me the time to complete my illustrated manifesto….oh, and I would need an accordion as well.

AF: Even among those of us that are obsessed with the amazing potential of artificial intelligence and the coming Singularity, we are concerned about mankind being destroyed by AIs gone wrong. Is there anything we can do to avoid this negative outcome?

STEEL: It seems to me that if mankind successfully creates something that ends up wiping out the entire species, then we deserve such a demise. There is always a way to overcome a problem and it is this sort of creative thinking that makes us so very special. If we are not up to the task, then evolution has passed us by and electronic life would then inherit the Earth. It’s also important to remember that when being chased by a robot, it’s best to keep a garden hose and a bucket of magnets handy.

AF: With achievements in art, video, music, philosophy, and complete insanity, you have shattered the traditional boundaries of creativity, expression, and existence in general. Is there any way for us to become as awesome as you, Dr. Steel?

STEEL: Why thank you ever so much for the tremendous compliment. I must assure you, however, that I am but a simple carbon life form. Until I am able to transcend biology, I hold no more potential than any other human on the planet. Let us all reach beyond our grasp to obtain the title of “awesome”.

Peter Thiel on X-Risks, Singularity, H+ Thursday, May 1 2008 

Interview with Ron Bailey at Reason. This is from last September. Excerpt:

Reason: Why are you supporting the Singularity Institute?

Thiel: I think it’s a group of really smart people working on an important problem. I think that the basic rule on philanthropy that I have is that I want to donate money to causes that are worthwhile but where there are no market-based mechanisms for them. There is a category of things that would benefit all of humanity but where the benefits are very diffuse and the costs are concentrated. Maybe it’s very long-term. So I focused my philanthropy on things with a 20-, 30-, 40-year horizon. The horizons are too long for a for-profit company to take advantage of, and the government and universities are not pushing things because maybe it’s too unconventional or it doesn’t easily fit into a particular political agenda or vision of the future. Those areas are probably systematically underfunded. It may be the only area of philanthropy that’s underfunded.

Continue.

Michael Anissimov on Immortality Update Sunday, Apr 27 2008 



This is ImmInst’s weekly streaming video show, with Justin Loew. I just did this interview about an hour ago. Topics covered: upcoming conference in the Bay Area, Lifeboat Foundation, economic and feasibility benefits of AGI, the word “Singularity” losing all meaning, immortalist strategy, etc. There is some audio static, but it gets better a little later on. I start talking around 6:40. Show length: 1 hour. On the unFriendly AI topic: I should’ve focused more on my actual answer, which is that the risk of UFAI is serious, but instead I answered, “what about people’s objections to AI leading to regulation against it?” I take the former seriously, but not the latter.

Summary of Recent Interviews Wednesday, Mar 26 2008 

I have given six interviews in the last year. All are audio except for the most recent.

Changesurfer Radio - May 5, 2007
Existential risks, AI, genetic engineering and space exploration

The RU Sirius Show - May 6, 2007
Immortality or Oblivion?
Give me immortality or give me death!

Podcasting the Singularity - September 18, 2007
A conversation with Michael Anissimov

The Future and You - March 5, 2008
March 5 episode: Michael Anissimov

FastForward Radio - March 16, 2008
Conversation with Michael Anissimov

Future Blogger - March 24, 2008
Interview: Michael Anissimov

Interview with Future Blogger Tuesday, Mar 25 2008 

My interview from yesterday with Future Blogger is here. A shorter summary of some issues in the interview and my highlights for the next ten years are here. First question:

V: What do you do and how is that related to the future?

MA: I am a blogger, fundraising director for the Lifeboat Foundation (LF), a director of the World Transhumanist Association (WTA) and a science/tech writer. All of these are related to futurism – my blog discusses futurist issues, the LF looks at future risks, and the WTA represents the futurist philosophy of transhumanism. As a science/tech writer, I do some writing about the latest technologies and materials, like carbon nanofoam or hypersonic flight, but equally enjoy writing about the frontiers of the sciences like paleontology, astronomy, and biology. Not everything I do relates to futurism, but much of it does.

Continue.

Michael Anissimov on FastForward Radio Monday, Mar 17 2008 

Last night I talked to Phil Bowermaster and Stephen Gordon on FastForward Radio. These guys are really fun and totally comfortable on the air. This was a long interview — I was on the phone for an hour and 15 minutes! (Although I only talk with them for a little under an hour.) If you want to hear me yakking it up, this is the place to do it.

Topics discussed included the relationship between Cosmicism and Transhumanism, my opinion of Dale Carrico’s critique of transhumanism, politics in transhumanism, Eliezer Yudkowsky’s “Transhumanism as Simplified Humanism”, nanobots vs. nanofactories, what I think will happen after the Singularity, mentioned the new AI Panic blog, and said which approaches I think might give rise to Artificial Intelligence. At the end I give a pitch for listeners to donate to the Lifeboat Foundation.

Also: this is the 500th post on Accelerating Future!

The Future and You Interview Tuesday, Mar 11 2008 

Recently I talked to Stephen Euin Cobb of The Future and You. The 71-minute mp3 is here. Past interviewees have included sci-fi authors Greg Bear and Vernor Vinge, senator John McCain, and our friends Aubrey de Grey and George Dvorsky.

If you are a writer or producer for a popular website, TV show, podcast, or magazine, and would like to interview me, send an email.

Episode summary:

“Michael Anissimov, the well known futurist, blogger and transhumanism activist is today’s featured guest.

Michael talks about many future-oriented topics such as: transhumanism and the singularity; cryonics and Paris Hilton; solar power verses nuclear power; synthetic biology and Craig Venter’s new artificial organism; and his own involvement with the founding of the Immortality Institute.

The Immortality Institute is a life extension activist organization that today includes hundreds of paying members and an active online community. Michael was one of its co-founders though he was still in High School at the time.

Currently Michael is the Lifeboat Foundation’s fundraising Director for North America; He is very much involved with the Center for Responsible Nanotechnology; and was recently voted to join the board of the World Transhumanist Association.

Hosted by Stephen Euin Cobb, this is the March 5, 2008 episode of The Future And You.

In this interview Michael expresses his enthusiasm about the ongoing revitalization of the World Transhumanist Association, which includes the new webzine being put together by R. U. Sirius.

He also discuses two technologies he feels could have a radical destabilizing effect on the world once they reach a certain threshold–which they may do within 20 years. These technologies are molecular nanotechnology (MNT) and Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). While their potential benefits are great, if not handled with extreme caution, he feels these technologies could cause disaster.

He also describes the trends he sees going on within the transhumanist movement today, and how he expects these trends to play out during the next few years. For example, he sees that the general public is beginning to warm up to transhumanist ideas thanks to movies and TV; but that there is still a lot of fear of transhumanism among the religious right. He agrees that there are a lot of closet transhumanists who haven’t come out yet. But he also says the new transhumanists seem to be of all ages, not just young people. He sees the next few years as a time of much greater acceptance of the transhumanist ideas and idealism.

Michael is a science and technology writer and consultant based in San Francisco. He has given talks on futurist issues at seminars and conferences in Los Angeles, Las Vegas, San Francisco, and at Yale University. His blog (acceleratingfuture.com) has become one of the primary focal points within the futurist community, including the communities of transhumanists and singularitarians. His blog features his own writings, the writings of others, as well as many important links to other sources of information about the future.”

Next Page »